.png){kind=small}
The Real Estate Shake-Up: Broker Wars, Agent Evolution & the Battle Over MLS Control
- Shane Hall
- Apr 21
- 5 min read
From the boardroom to the closing table, the real estate industry is undergoing a seismic shift. This month, we’re diving into the stories shaping the future of housing — from brokerage consolidation and the rise of Compass, to the evolving role of real estate agents post-NAR settlement, to the DOJ’s mounting scrutiny of MLS monopolies, the growing conflict over private exclusive listings, and even how global tariffs may impact your next transaction.
Whether you're an agent, investor, or just real estate curious, this breakdown cuts through the noise and delivers what matters — with insight, context, and just a touch of opinion.
Let's get into it.
Brokerage Battles: Compass, Long & Foster, and Berkshire Hathaway
The real estate chessboard in D.C. just got flipped. Compass — already the region's #1 brokerage by volume — is rumored to be in talks to acquire HomeServices of America (the parent of Long & Foster), a Berkshire Hathaway company. If this happens, Compass could command nearly $20 billion in sales volume in the D.C. area alone. Berkshire’s denial of the sale hasn't stopped industry speculation.
Add to that Compass’s recent acquisition of Washington Fine Properties, and you’re looking at a brokerage juggernaut with tentacles across every luxury zip code in the DMV.
The implications:
Compass would essentially absorb two of the most prestigious and established real estate names in the region.
Their footprint would expand across every price tier — from first-time homes to $10M+ estates.
The acquisition would further cement Compass's reputation not just as a brokerage, but as a data-powered real estate platform aiming to dominate market share via listings volume.
What this means for you:
For agents: consolidation could mean fewer brand options and more pressure to compete on value within mega-teams. Smaller independent brokerages may feel the squeeze or seek acquisition.
For buyers and sellers: a single dominant brokerage could improve efficiency, but may limit choice and competition. Expect branding shifts and possible service structure changes.
This trend isn't isolated. Brokerages in Chicago, New York, and even smaller metro areas are seeing similar consolidation as the market contracts. Compass CEO Robert Reffkin has openly stated that gaining "depth of inventory" is key to becoming the platform of choice for both agents and clients.
Zillow vs. Compass: The Battle Over Private Exclusive Listings
A growing battle is unfolding between tech titan Zillow and Compass over the practice of "private exclusive" listings. Compass has leaned heavily into this strategy, allowing sellers to market homes only to Compass agents and clients before opening them to the public MLS. They argue it offers discretion, pricing control, and early testing of the market.
But Zillow has fired back. Starting May 1, 2025, Zillow will prohibit any listings from appearing on its site if they are publicly marketed elsewhere without also being submitted to the MLS within 24 hours. According to Zillow, this new rule ensures transparency and equal buyer access. Compass sees it as an overreach and a threat to seller control.
What this means for the industry:
Exclusive listings may lose reach and visibility if excluded from Zillow, impacting seller exposure.
Agents and brokerages must tread carefully: either comply with MLS rules or risk losing major search platform visibility.
The conflict signals a broader debate about control over listing data, and whether platforms or brokerages should dictate how homes are marketed.
Zillow claims the moral high ground of transparency. Compass champions seller control and privacy. As the dust settles, one thing is clear: listing access is the next big frontier in the real estate power struggle.
The Commission Shake-Up: NAR’s Settlement & Agent Fallout
The $418 million NAR settlement is reshaping how agents get paid. Under new rules, MLSs can no longer advertise buyer-agent commissions, meaning those fees are now negotiable — and potentially paid directly by the buyer.
Industry response has been swift:
Buyer confusion is rising as they navigate compensation conversations for the first time.
Listing agents and sellers must now determine whether to offer commission to attract buyers' agents or leave it off the table.
Some brokerages are piloting new models — flat fees, reduced commissions, or hourly consulting-style arrangements.
Data points:
Agent ranks are shrinking fast — down 27% since 2019.
Commissions have dipped slightly: Redfin reports buyer-agent commission averages dropped from 2.45% to 2.37% over the past year.
The average number of transactions per agent has also fallen, leading many part-time agents to exit.
The new reality:
Agents must articulate their value more clearly than ever.
Strategic negotiation, market expertise, and local insights are more prized than open-house scheduling.
Expect a stratification of the industry: elite agents thriving while others struggle or exit.
DOJ vs. the MLS: Monopoly or Market Tool?
In perhaps the most overlooked but monumental shift, the DOJ is now targeting the MLS system itself as a potential monopoly. The appointment of Roger Alford as the #2 in the DOJ Antitrust Division is a signal fire.
Alford, who served as an expert witness in the Sitzer/Burnett case against NAR, believes that:
MLSs operate as regional monopolies under the guise of cooperation.
Rules like Clear Cooperation (CCP) prevent agents from marketing listings independently.
The system suppresses innovation, inflates commission costs, and creates entry barriers.
In Alford's own words:
"Even with all these advances, the U.S. realty market suffers from a widespread dearth of competition... where anyone can play as long as they adhere to a particular set of anticompetitive rules."
What might change:
DOJ lawsuits or regulatory actions that untie commission sharing from MLS access.
Increased competition from tech platforms and off-market models.
Restructuring of local MLS cooperatives and board policies.
The debate is complex. MLSs do provide structure, data integrity, and consumer access. But critics argue that this structure has calcified into protectionism that stifles innovation.
The Global Twist: Tariffs Are Back. Will They Hit Housing?
President Trump’s proposed global tariffs may sound like a trade war headline, but the trickle-down to real estate is real:
Materials: Lumber, steel, aluminum, appliances — all subject to potential cost increases.
Timelines: Builders may face delays as sourcing becomes more complicated.
Costs: Renovators and developers could see margins thin, impacting pricing and new supply.
While not immediate, prolonged tariffs could result in:
Higher new-construction prices
Limited affordability in already-tight markets
Cautious investor behavior
In a market where cost and confidence are everything, even indirect economic headwinds matter.
Takeaways: What This All Means for You
Real estate is changing. Quickly. Here’s how to stay sharp:
Agents: Specialize, educate, and lean into tech. Be a strategist, not a facilitator. Define your value.
Brokerages: Build brand loyalty and transparency. Position yourself as a trusted advisor, not just a transaction handler.
Buyers/Sellers: Leverage your power. Negotiate commissions, ask better questions, and expect more for your money.
Investors: Monitor macro trends and regulatory activity closely. Position for agility in a volatile landscape.
Want More Insights Like This?
👉 Subscribe to get monthly updates, market reports, and behind-the-scenes takes from The Housecats.
Or follow along on Instagram [@housecatsre] for the latest video breakdowns and luxury home tours.
